Scapegoat - Scales of Justice Burning
Supreme Court of Canada Manuscript Ruling
by
Book Cover & Preview Text
I hope you will welcome my book
“Scapegoat—Scales of Justice Burning”
Take the journey to understand the use of one’s name and its significance both historically and personally.
This book represents the fusion of historicity and what should be natural justice.
This is my attempt to provide an insight into the factual legal arguments and philosophical understanding as to why the decision to use my name was used in this judgment by the legal, insurance and judicial communities.
This book is dedicated to all those who have been wrongfully accused and used as a scapegoat.
“In matters of Style, swim with the current
In matters of Principle, stand like a rock”
Thomas Jefferson
What inspired me to account for a certain member of the Church family as mentioned below also became an inspiration to display the phrase by Thomas Jefferson above since he was a friend of Angelica Schuyler Church. Thomas Jefferson also describes most eloquently, the feelings of conviction I have with respect to my own defence of myself and the truth.
Angelica was the sister of Elizabeth Schuyler Hamilton, the wife
Of
Alexander Hamilton
The First United States Secretary of the Treasury and who was also the aide-de-camp and confident to
General George Washington the First President of the United States of America.
Angelica Schuyler Church was the wife
Of
John Barker Church
There are many other stories about Angelica which guide historical writers about her involvement with Thomas Jefferson and perhaps they are more important then the facts we know about this historical figure. How she is described in history should be based on facts not rhetoric similarly to the way in which the Supreme Court of Canada account for Chris Porter in their factual reasons for judgment in,
Whiten v. Pilot Insurance Company SCC 27229
The Supreme Court of Canada erroneously found that I had a train of thought that influenced Pilot Insurance Company to unethically, deny the house fire claim advanced by their insured.The Supreme Court of Canada also declared this in its factual reasons for the judgment without any testimony from me. I did not submit evidence about myself to the Trial Court and the Court of Appeal for Ontario. Neither found that I had a train of thought that influenced Pilot Insurance Company to deny the house fire claim. My name was irrelevant until the Supreme Court of Canada made its ruling.
There is testimonial evidence about me from others, stating that it was not my train of thought as described by the Supreme Court of Canada in its findings, however these facts cannot be found in the factual reasons for judgment in the Supreme Court of Canada ruling. There is also testimonial evidence of who denied the fire claim however these facts cannot be found in the factual reasons in the Supreme Court of Canada judgment. Why the revelation in the Supreme Court of Canada judgment about my name?
The Supreme Court of Canada has recorded in it findings, false accounts of me since February 22, 2002, despite having received material from this book several times.
This book is my attempt to clarify my role and provide details of why I believe I was wrongfully named by the Supreme Court of Canada.
I was not on trial and since I was not a manager at Pilot Insurance Company I was not allowed to give evidence for Pilot.
In its wisdom how did the Supreme Court of Canada make an error describing my role and status as a Senior Claims Manager?
They also know it is not just a mistake in title but also a mistake in identity as the reasons for judgment describe me.
The Supreme Court of Canada made an inference rather than a factual finding, that it was my train of thought that influenced Pilot Insurance Company.
Only as a manager could I be responsible for the company and in my role and status at Pilot Insurance Company I was not a decision maker on large loss claims.
The independent adjuster testified that it was not my train of thought and the lawyer for Pilot Insurance Company identified the Vice President as the person who denied the claim of Keith and Daphne Whiten. At the end of my book I provide certified evidence to support these two statements from the Court of Appeal for Ontario.
Why did the Supreme Court of Canada describe me in its factual reasons of the judgment when there was no factual evidence about me from the lower Court Trial or the Court of Appeal for Ontario?
What follows in this book are the facts of the case as described by me and the consequences of the Supreme Court of Canada’s description of Chris Porter.
On the cover of this book is a painting about three historical members of my ancestral family one of which painted the portrait and two of which are in the painting. The painting was completed 210 years after the journey to America is described by the artist. Frederic Edwin Church’s “Oil on Canvas”, was completed in 1846 of an event he called “Hooker and Company Journeying through the Wilderness in 1636 from Plymouth to Hartford.” It was purchased from the artist before 1850 by the Wadsworth Atheneum for $1.30. The Wadsworth Atheneum describes the painting stating that, “The work shows the influence of Thomas Cole—Church’s teacher thanks to an introduction from Daniel Wadsworth.” I want to thank the Wadsworth Atheneum for allowing me to post the portrait of ancestors related to both the artist and myself. Historians have factually confirmed that this journey did take place and that Richard Church and Anne Marsh did travel with Reverend Thomas Hooker to discover Hartford and that this painting is in fact genuine.
Formats
Book Details
About the Book
Scapegoat – Scales of Justice Burning is a book about my life and how my name was used to assist a large corporation avoid corporate responsibility and the consequences of a bad decision. The Supreme Court of Canada ruled that their decision was in bad faith and upheld a lower court judgment of one million dollars against Pilot Insurance Company. To the surprise of the author, they also named him as a catalyst in creating a train of thought with the decision makers of Pilot Insurance Company and also aligned him as one of the decision makers. This book is the author’s attempt to prove with evidence compiled from the very court where he was never called to testify, that he was not a decision maker who made the decision to deny their insured’s claim, and did not evoke a train of thought as described in the Supreme Court of Canada ruling. Scapegoat – Scales of Justice Burning is also about the implications of abusing a person’s name as if it carries no meaning or purpose. As exemplified by the description of some of my own ancestors, there is clearly more meaning in a person’s name than the disrespect shown by the Supreme Court of Canada. A court that truly believes that its status is greater than the citizens it serves and the government that appoints Supreme Court of Canada Justices. Scapegoat – Scales of Justice Burning has been a crusade that restores democratic rights for individual citizens of Canada and to confront those who would burn down the very foundation of justice. Natural justice has not been served. It is uncanny that in a democratic society, there would be no mechanism in place for judicial review and correction to address an injustice whereby one’s reputation is damaged by comments made by a high court.
About the Author
Chris Porter was born and raised in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. He graduated in both Law Enforcement and has a Philosophy Degree from York University in Canada. His career has spanned over a number of decades involved in the area of claims examining and private investigations. An interest in law and justice has emanated from years of being plagued by issues raised in this case. Genealogical research has been the main focus of his interest and helping people connect with family and the past has worked into both his profession as a private investigator and personally.