By all accounts, the “Anonymous [Chronicler] of Carpentras”
whose manuscript predates Coppier’s book, was a buccaneering
musketeer who was shipwrecked in Martinique for nine months
in 1619. This manuscript might well be the oldest and one of the
most extensive French descriptions of the Caribs known to date
(Moreau, 1990:21). But Coppier’s account of the Lesser Antilles is
at the very least more comprehensive. On a number of interesting
and informative items, Coppier’s description also corroborates the
account of the anonymous chronicler of Carpentras.
Coppier’s style of writing is fairly similar to that of the
author whom Dampierre refers to as l’Anonyme de la Grenade, the
“Anonymous [chronicler] of Grenada.” Dampierre surmises him to
be Father [Bénigne] Bresson (Dampierre, 1904:149). This chronicler
of events on Grenada and surrounding islands from 1649 to 1659
was indeed subsequently identified as being Father Bénigne Bresson
(Petitjean Roget: 1975).
For a number of French and European authors of this period,
traveling to foreign lands yielded three major “fruits”: prudence, science and virtue (Doiron, 1995:23). Coppier is one such author. For
him, traveling abroad is “a school that teaches the perfect virtues”
and all disciplines. History, like traveling, is the “mistress of life”
(“vitae magistra”) (Preface: 12). Its ultimate aim, its teleology is the
progress of civilization.
History is under the direction of a philosophy wherein laws
are said to be rooted in universal reason. For Coppier, history is
intrinsically philosophical, inherently moral. But this appreciation
of history and of its near double (voyage) with its representation of
the world, its search for truth; its seemingly rational and universal
aspirations often conflicts with Coppier’s esthetics and with his style
of writing; with the artistic, stylistic, literary reality of his craft.
Coppier is much more of a moralist than a moralizer; he engages
in some moralizing, but he describes more than he prescribes and he
doubts as much as he sermonizes and asserts. Like Montaigne who
preceded him, and the great French moralists who came after him,
Coppier is an author who values wisdom, and for whom philosophy,
discourse and everyday life are intricately linked. For Coppier, virtue
is not only theoretical, it is also and mainly practical; it is a practical
matter. Like a number of other French authors of his era, Coppier
wanted to influence the behavior of his reader.
Twenty-four years after Robert Burton’s Anatomy of Melancholy
(1621), and some forty years before John Bunyan’s The Pilgrim’s
Progress (1678) Guillaume Coppier was traveling through life and
the Atlantic. He sailed the perilous sea and the storms of existence,
staying clear of treacherous reefs and of the sweet songs of sea
nymphs while trying to make it safely back home.
For Coppier (1606–1674), as for his contemporary the Spanish
Jesuit Baltasar Gracián (1601–1658), Milicia es la vida del hombre
contra la malicia del hombre, “Man’s life is warfare against the malice
of men” (Maxim 13). As Professor Louis Van Delft reminds us in
reference to this aphorism, “to be unaware of this is to run the risk
of ending up like the lamb or the donkey” (Van Delft, 1985: 92).
Paraphrasing Van Delft’s eloquent and insightful remarks on the
“moralist-cartographer,” we may venture that like Gracián, Coppier
is one of those 17th-century moralist-cartographers whose absolute
urgency is that of knowing how to live. This most perilous enterprise
of all “is due to the hostility of the environment, and even more so,
due to the antagonism of other viatores,” other travelers.
Coppier’s chronicle is all of the above and it is also a manual
for prospective settlers in the West Indies. It is a handbook
containing advice and information on the natural resources of the
Lesser Antilles, on their inhabitants, both the indigenous peoples
and the non-natives, predominantly Europeans. In addition, it is a
witnessing in praise of Coppier’s protector, the Magistrate [François]
de Solleysel, of Coppier’s home city of Lyon, of the ideals of the
French Counter Reformation, and of the kingdom of France. Last,
but in no way least, Coppier’s History and Voyage to the West Indies
is witness bearing and propaganda in favor of France’s burgeoning
colonial enterprise in the Caribbean.